Go back to the enewsletter Dinner by Heston Blu

first_imgGo back to the e-newsletter >Dinner by Heston Blumenthal, the chef’s award winning London restaurant, will open a second establishment in Melbourne 20 October 2015. The opening will mark Heston’s first permanent restaurant outside the UK.Located on the third floor of Crown Towers Hotel, the 120-cover restaurant overlooks the city across the Yarra River. The menu offers contemporary dishes inspired by historic British gastronomy dating back to the 1300s.Blumenthal’s fascination with history and gastronomy was triggered back in the late ’90s after reading a 15th-century manuscript known as The Vivendier. The book spoke of a dining experience full of playfulness and theatre, as well as intriguing ingredients and recipes. What started as an exercise in curiosity triggered almost 20 years of research and discovery, with historically inspired dishes appearing on the menus of both The Fat Duck restaurant and Hinds Head pub.When the opportunity arose to open a restaurant in London the idea of ‘Dinner’ began to emerge and in January 2011 Dinner by Heston Blumenthal opened its doors. Alongside Ashley Palmer-Watts, the two chefs created a menu inspired by the tastes and flavours of Britain, from the farmers’ table to the royal courts, offering a contemporary gastronomic insight from Medieval c.1300 to Victorian c.1800. The Restaurant achieved great recognition including 2 Michelin stars.The Melbourne reincarnation will serve dinner 7 days a week and lunch on Fridays and Saturdays. The history and modernity combines in the open kitchen, where the past meets high-tech and guests can watch the chef brigade prepare, using the latest kitchen technology alongside historic pulley-operated spit roasts.Located inside the kitchen, the chef’s table allows up to 6 guests to interact direct with the team, while enjoying an exclusive tasting menu served by the head chef. The private room, which offers dining for up to 10 guests, enjoys clear views of the kitchen, the Yarra River and Melbourne’s CBD.In the creation of the Dinner by Heston menu the chefs worked with food historian Ivan Day, the kitchens of King Henry VIII at Hampton Court Palace and drew reference from the historic collection of literature at the British Library. However, the menu at Dinner by Heston in Melbourne uses these dishes as a framework to celebrate Australian ingredients and introduces historic Australian dishes too, like the The Lamington Cake (c.1900).The bar, exclusively for guests of the restaurant, also marries ancient and modern. In collaboration with Barman Tony Conigliaro, a collection of cocktails has been created, each with a unique historic reference and representing the history between Britain and Australia.Guests enter the restaurant through a 20m dark wood corridor that has its own aroma based on the notes of damp moss, wood smoke and leather. The chef’s table is surrounded by an original illustration by English artist Dave McKean, while the room will display historic inspired sculptures commissioned by Australian artist David Bromley.Reservations for the restaurant open on-line www.dinnerbyheston.com.au on Tuesday 20 October.Go back to the e-newsletter >last_img read more

Its a toxic place How the online world of white nationalists distorts

first_img ‘It’s a toxic place.’ How the online world of white nationalists distorts population genetics And in the ways that memes evolve, some go through a second stage of edits. People will add additional information to the figures. For example, there was a different plot showing the ancestry of Europeans, Asians, Africans, and Native Americans and then somebody had added a little arrow pointing to the Native American cluster and annotated it with, “Elizabeth Warren” [referring to controversy surrounding the Massachusetts senator’s ancestry].Q: Are there specific types of population genetics studies that get their attention?A: They’re interested in anything that would reinforce traditional, discrete racial categories. Intelligence is probably the No. 1 topic that they gravitate toward. And anything pertaining to history of human migrations, or things that play into traditional classifications of racial phenotypes like facial morphology or skin color. There was a paper on lactose tolerance in Europeans and that turned into this weird viral YouTube trend where white nationalists were chugging bottles of milk, presumably to flaunt their European heritage.Q: Right after you first noticed this trend and posted about it on Twitter, you were interviewed for a piece in The Atlantic. Did the white nationalists comment on that, as well?A: After that piece came out, I wanted to know what they were going to say about it on Stormfront, so I was on the website refreshing it over and over, which really isn’t a healthy thing to do. It’s a toxic place. When they finally saw it, the first few comments were actually rather celebratory, as they saw the article as evidence that the “liberal, biased, Jew-controlled media” are nervous about the growth of white nationalism. About me, there were comments like, “He says he’s a grad student, but he’s probably never even seen a principal component analysis plot,” which is ironic because that’s about half of my dissertation. And it was pretty alarming seeing my name on the site. After that, I took a break from doing this work for a while for my own mental health.Q: Can scientists do anything to prevent their work from being misused by these groups?A: I don’t think engaging them directly will work. In an argument between a logical person and illogical person, the logical person is always going to lose because the illogical person isn’t playing by the same rules. The misappropriations and misinterpretations run so deep that you’ll just get shouted down and personally attacked, and you’re not going to change anyone’s mind.But I think there’s growing recognition that we as scientists bear some responsibility for guiding the public interpretation of our work. In the broad scheme of things, people are excited about the work we’re doing. The genomic revolution is still well underway. But I think because of precisely that, we need to think more carefully about not just our own interpretation of the work, but anticipating how our work might be misinterpreted and trying to preemptively patch up the holes in that logic.*Correction, 22 May, 5:30 p.m.: This article originally incorrectly stated that Carlson intends to incorporate these findings into his dissertation. Jedidiah Carlson Samuel Corum/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images By Michael PriceMay. 22, 2018 , 2:00 PM Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwe White supremacists, such as these marching in Charlottesville, Virginia, gather in online forums to discuss population genetics research. Q: Do any of the white nationalists discussing these papers actually know what they’re talking about?A: There’s a range of expertise and familiarity. Some are fairly familiar with some of the science. It behooves them to know the science so they can feel like they are going toe-to-toe with the people actually doing the science. There are even some users who have graduate degrees. They aren’t population geneticists, but some of them are quite well-educated, both formally and informally.Q: How do they learn about these papers in the first place?A: Often someone will post a link in a forum to a sort of lower-level news article about some topic they either agree or don’t agree with. Then someone will say, “Who knows the science here? Explain it to me.” And there are several people there who are somewhat familiar with the literature and follow it.Q: How do they misappropriate the work?A: People will grab figures from scientific papers and edit them in several different ways to make them look like they support the white nationalist ideology. For instance, in a 2008 Science paper, researchers published a figure with a plot inferring regional ancestry of dozens of different populations around the world. Based on the genetic compositions of hundreds of individuals, the figure divided the populations into clusters that revealed patterns in their ancestral population structure.So [people on the forums] take this plot and add some subtle text like “The genetic reality of race,” with no context showing what the scientists were actually looking at, and ignoring the fact that there’s a continuum among the individuals. Then they turn these images into memes and try to make them go viral (see example, below). Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Jedidiah Carlson Email And then, of course, the conversation was peppered with abhorrent insinuations about nonwhite races and the researchers themselves—“These are NOT scientists. These are Anti-Whites” wrote one Stormfront poster—and numerous fundamental misunderstandings about the science and its implications.Digging further, Carlson discovered this was not an isolated incident. Stormfront and similar online forums, as well as the comment sections on “alt-right” news websites and Twitter accounts, regularly host what he’s dubbed “informal journal clubs,” dedicated to dissecting population genetics papers and sorting them into those that support a white nationalist ideology and those that don’t. For more than a year, he has followed the evolution of this strange, racist trend. Carlson was scheduled to speak to a population genetics conference last week about those findings, but couldn’t make the talk. He did, however, discuss with Science what he’s learned about these groups. This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity. The genetic reality of race.#science #anthropology #sociology #psychology #economics #altright pic.twitter.com/0Ocl55DpRZ— Uncensored Science (@RealScienceNow) June 26, 2017 A little more than a year ago, Jedidiah Carlson was searching online for a 2008 paper in Nature analyzing hundreds of thousands of point mutations in various human population groups around the world. Heady stuff, but fascinating to the bioinformatics graduate student at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. As he scanned the list of search results, an unusual one stood out: a link to a forum post on the website Stormfront, one of the internet’s oldest and most notorious hangouts for white nationalists, white supremacists, and neo-Nazis.“Curiosity got the better of me, so I decided to see what they had to say about this [paper],” Carlson says.Following the link, he found forum users involved in a rather in-depth discussion of the paper’s genetics and how these mutations supposedly shaped the emergence of different human races. There were a few problems, though. Somehow, many in the forum thought they were debating an entirely different 2008 Nature paper, leading to what Carlson calls “a convoluted mess.”last_img read more